Legal Opinion

Klundt v. Bachtold

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1920No. 15557PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Franklin county, Truax, J., entered April 19, 1919, upon findings favorable to tbe plaintiff, in an action for conversion, tried to tbe court.

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— October 1, 1917, Jacob Klundt and Albert Bayer entered into an agreement whereby tbe former leased to tbe latter, for a period of five years, a farm in Franklin county, Washington. That instrument, in so far as it affects this case, reads as follows:

*596“It is agreed that the lessor is leaving on said place hogs and pigs about 20 in number, that the lessee is to attend to the same and care for them and the increase thereof, that as to all feed that is bought for the purpose of feeding such hogs or pigs or the increase thereof, each party hereto is to pay one-half; that of the hogs or pigs so…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Union Stock Yards Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Bowles Co. v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Tuttle v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Alter v. Bank of StockhamNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. City of Newburyport v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. McCloudIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Gugino v. Ortega (In Re Pierce)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2010
  3. In Re Johnson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. McGirr v. FarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API