Legal Opinion

Voorhees v. Cox

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1944No. 12809PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Missouri discharging a writ of habeas corpus theretofore issued in behalf of the above-named appellant. The facts are presented by an agreed statement, which has been certified to this court as the record on appeal, pursuant to Rule 76 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The facts agreed, and as found, by the trial court, material to the disposition of this appeal, are the following:

March 21, 1935, appellant was sentenced, on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Anderson v. CorallSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Zerbst v. KidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Duncan v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Falter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Odis R. Van Buskirk v. Fred T. Wilkinson, as Warden of the United States Penitentiary, McNeil Island, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. Moorehead v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  4. Pueblo v. Pérez MéndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  5. James B. Stinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API