Legal Opinion

Zerbst v. Kidwell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 23, 1938No. Nos. 782—789PublishedCited by 245 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

Respondents were paroled before completing sentences in federal prisons. 1 Before expiration of their sentences and while on parole, they committed second federal offenses, for which they were convicted, sentenced, and thereafter completely served sentences in the Atlanta Penitentiary. Respondents contend that, from the moment of their imprisonment in the Penitentiary under the second sentences, they also began service of the unexpired part of their original sentences. If this contention is correct respondents have also completely served the unexpired parts of the first sentences:

Petitioner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CorallSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. United States Ex Rel. Demarois v. FarrellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  4. Zerbst v. KidwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  5. Kidwell v. ZerbstDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1937

3Cited by245 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Young v. Com. Bd. of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Conner v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Geraghty v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

240 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API