People v. Dunn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of" the Superior Court of Placer County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
— This is a consolidation of four actions to recover from the defendant license taxes by virtue of an ordinance (No. 3) passed by the board of supervisors of Placer County on Monday, the first day of October, 1883, providing that persons selling spirituous liquors, etc., in said county must procure from the tax collector a license authorizing them to carry on that business, for which they must pay to the tax collector a tax of twenty-four dollars per quarter and a fee of one dollar; and further providing that the tax collector may authorize suit in the name of the people to be…
2Cited by2 opinions
- County of San Diego v. SeifertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Merced County v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896