Legal Opinion

Callaway v. Butler & Stephens

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 3, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Factors. Interest and Usury. Commissions. Charge of Court. Before Judge Bower. Mitchell Superior Court. March Term, 1887. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Chief Justice.

This was a proceeding to foreclose a mortgage made by Callaway to Butler & Stephens to secure the paymeiit of several promissory notes made by Wright & Callaway to the mortgagees. Callaway was one of the members of tbe firm of Wright & Callaway. The notes were executed in renewal of other notes, or at least, of other contracts made touching the same debt. Tbe plea relied upon was usury, and the question as to usury arose out of the construction and effect of a “ cotton contract.” That contract was as follows:

“In consideration of the sum of $3,000 advanced to ns by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cockle v. FlackSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. MacKenzie v. Garnett, Stubbs & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. Hollis v. Swift & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Peightal v. Cotton States Building Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Norwood Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. White v. Guilmartin & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  5. FIRST FEDERAL &C. ASSN. v. Norwood &C. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API