Legal Opinion

Peightal v. Cotton States Building Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 27, 1901PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Lamar. Tried below before Hon. E. S. Chambers.

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by the appellee, a Texas corporation, against appellants, J. B. and Hettie Peightal, to recover $500 and interest according to the terms of a contract between the parties, the terms of which will be hereinafter stated, together with. $50 attorney’s fee, and for foreclosure of an alleged mechanic’s lien on a-certain house and lot situated in Ennis, Texas.

The appellants, defendants below, plead under oath that the contract declared upon was usurious; that the contract was devised by appellee and the National Building and Loan Association as a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Interstate Building & Loan Ass'n v. GoforthTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Hamburg v. O. P. Wood & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Mitchell v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Atlanta Savings Bank v. SpencerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. J. S. Brown & Co. v. LessingTexas Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cotton v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. C. C. Slaughter Co. v. EllerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Garland v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Wilson Finance Company v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. National Bond & Investment Co. v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API