Legal Opinion

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Norwood Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 9, 1956No. 19327PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts). 1. Code § 57-101 makes it illegal to reserve, charge, or take for any loan or advance of money any rate of interest greater than 8% per annum, either directly or indirectly by way of commission for advances, discount, or by any contract or contrivance or device whatever. As said by this court in Newcomb v. Niskey’s Lake, Inc., 190 Ga. 565, 567 (10 S. E. 2d 51), exaction of usury is odious, illegal, and immoral. “Any person, company, or corporation violating the provisions of section 57-101 shall forfeit the entire interest so charged or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Cook v. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Pope v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Butner v. BoifeuilletSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Sanders v. NicolsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stephen Z. Meyers v. Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Kaski v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Arbitration Between Laminoirs-Trefileries-Cableries De Lens, S. A. v. Southwire Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  4. Dent v. Associates Equity Services Co. (In Re Dent)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1991
  5. Moore v. Comfed Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API