Legal Opinion
Dezell v. E. E. Black, Ltd.
District Court, D. Guam
Decided February 2, 1961No. Civ. No. 86-60PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILMARTIN, District Judge.
The claim set forth against the defendant, Black, Raber-Kief and Associates in the complaint herein is an action for negligence. The complaint alleges, inter alia, that defendant Underwriters at Lloyds issued policies of insurance “which bind Underwriters at Lloyds to pay on behalf of defendant Black, Raber-Kief and Associates any sums for which said Black, Raber-Kief and Associates may become liable to pay by reason of negligence up to the policy limits of said policies.” Complaint 3. The suit is brought as a “direct action,” against both of the defendants, pursuant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- West Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sampsell v. StraubCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Warner Bros. Pictures v. BrodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vehrs v. Jefferson Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Dove v. Dairyland Insurance Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. GuerreroDistrict Court, D. Guam · 1962