Legal Opinion
Sampsell v. Straub
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 21, 1952No. 12676_1PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
On first hearing of this appeal, 189 F.2d 379, we concluded that the bankrupts, Curtiss Straub and his wife Miriam, were entitled to have their California residence set aside from the bankrupt estate as exempt homestead property although their declaration of homestead had not been recorded as required to become effective under California law until after bankruptcy adjudication. Recognizing that Section 70, sub. c of the Bankruptcy Act 1 arms the trustee “as to all property of the bankrupt at the date of bankruptcy * * * ” with “all the rights, remedies, and powers of a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gudger v. MantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Coley v. HeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Schuler-Knox Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Jefferson Transfer Co. v. HullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- In the Matter of Chaseley's Foods, Inc., D/B/A Vic's Super Foods, Debtor. Appeal of Daniel L. Freeland, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. SpeersSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. SpeersSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McAllester v. Aldridge (In Re Anderson)District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
- Chugach Natives, Inc. v. Doyon, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.