Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Hamara

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1989No. 75A03-8806-CV-00186PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Maria and Louis Sanchez appeal a summary judgment granted in favor of Barbara Hamara on Maria’s claim for personal injury and Louis’ claim for loss of consortium. The trial court granted summary judgment on the grounds that the Sanchez’ claims are barred by the Workmen’s Compensation Act. This appeal raises two issues, which we restate and renumber as:

1. Whether genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether the Workmen’s Compensation Act provides the Sanchez’ exclusive remedy.

2. Whether the trial court erred in striking portions of Maria’s affidavit.

We affirm.

On March 28,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gaboury v. Ireland Road Grace Brethren, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McMahan v. Snap on Tool Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. O'Dell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Ward v. TillmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Aetna Ins. Co. of the Midwest v. RodriguezIndiana Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. RoushIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Burke v. WilfongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Indianapolis Podiatry, P.C. v. EfroymsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Marion County Ex Rel. Peterson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Northcutt v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API