Legal Opinion

Marion County Ex Rel. Peterson v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2008No. 73A01-0705-CV-238PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

For many years, Indiana counties have been required to pay a portion of the cost of operating juvenile detention facilities. When the State attempted to collect a combined arrearage of approximately $75 million from Marion and St. Joseph Counties, the Counties filed a lawsuit seeking relief from their debts. The trial court entered summary judgment for the State, and we affirm. 1

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Article 9, Section 2 of the Indiana Constitution provides: “The General Assembly shall provide institutions for the correction and reformation of juvenile offenders.” As…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Kuhnle Brothers, Inc. v. County of GeaugaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Levald, Inc. v. City of Palm DesertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Oelling v. RaoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Board of Com'rs v. Kokomo City Plan Com'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1975

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pain Center of SE Indiana, LLC v. Origin Healthcare Solutions LLCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Stenehjem, ex rel. v. National Audubon Society, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. May v. GeorgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. City of Hammond v. Herman & Kittle Properties, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. JarrellsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API