Legal Opinion
Burke v. Wilfong
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 1994No. 64A04-9304-CV-118PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFEF, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Joe Glenn Burke, Jr., appeals from a judgment in favor of Mark Wilfong and Joseph Hulse claiming that worker's compensation is not his exclusive remedy, and that he is entitled to bring a third party claim. We affirm.
ISSUES
I. Did Burke's injury arise out of and in the course of his employment?
II. Was Burke in the same employ as Wil-fong and Hulse?
FACTS
In early 1991, Joe Glenn Burke, Jr., Joseph Hulse, Michael Antecki and Mark Wil-fong were all employed by Hunter Corporation as millwrights. Hunter, a Lake County contractor, had a contract with…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Malachowski v. Bank One, IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Krueger v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Foshee v. Shoney's, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. RoushIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- DePuy, Inc. v. FarmerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Rogers v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Tapia v. HeavnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Harvey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.