Legal Opinion
Rutherford v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 21, 1983No. C-83-1433 RPAPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AGUILAR, District Judge.
This action is before the Court on defendant shipowner’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. Plaintiff is a merchant seaman and a member of the International Seafarers’ Union. Plaintiff’s union has a collective bargaining agreement with defendant shipowner. One provision of the collective bargaining agreement limits defendant shipowner’s duty of maintenance to $8.00 per day. Plaintiff has brought this action against defendant shipowner seeking a sum greater than $8.00 per day in maintenance. Plaintiff contends that $8.00 per day is an…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cory Gardiner, William E. Bishop v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., United States Lines, Inc., Etc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- George Barnes v. Andover Company, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Gillikin v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Abogado v. International Marine CarriersDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
- Da Silva v. Pacific King, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.