Legal Opinion

Da Silva v. Pacific King, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1987No. D003989PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, J.

Summary

Plaintiff and appellant August Da Silva brought suit against defendants M/V Mary Antoinette (.Mary Antoinette) and Pacific King, Inc. (Pacific King) under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 688) and general maritime law. After a trial the jury found that Da Silva was injured as a result of the unseaworthiness of the Mary Antoinette. The jury awarded Da Silva $78,500 in compensatory damages and $17,000 in past and future “medical cure.” However the jury refused to award Da Silva’s wife, who is also a plaintiff and appellant, any damages for loss of consortium.

On appeal Da Silva…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Lundborg v. Keystone Shipping Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Abbott v. Taz ExpressCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. DawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Hawthorne Investment, LLC v. Lam CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API