Da Silva v. Pacific King, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, J.
Summary
Plaintiff and appellant August Da Silva brought suit against defendants M/V Mary Antoinette (.Mary Antoinette) and Pacific King, Inc. (Pacific King) under the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 688) and general maritime law. After a trial the jury found that Da Silva was injured as a result of the unseaworthiness of the Mary Antoinette. The jury awarded Da Silva $78,500 in compensatory damages and $17,000 in past and future “medical cure.” However the jury refused to award Da Silva’s wife, who is also a plaintiff and appellant, any damages for loss of consortium.
On appeal Da Silva…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Lundborg v. Keystone Shipping Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
- Abbott v. Taz ExpressCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. DawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Hawthorne Investment, LLC v. Lam CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.