Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 29, 1970No. 154-41362-2PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

The plaintiff-respondent in this case, Neil R. Palmer, is both a longshoreman and a farmer who feeds cattle in preparation for their eventual resale. In furtherance of this second activity, plaintiff aided his father-in-law in baling hay with the father-in-law’s Massey-Ferguson baler, taking hay in lieu of payment for his work.

On the date of the accident, plaintiff worked a shift on the docks and then went out to take one of his relatively rare turns actually operating the baler. Plaintiff generally loaded bales or otherwise helped with the work. Sometime later, plaintiff’s brother-in-law…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pike v. Frank G. Hough Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Brown v. Quick Mix Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Morningstar v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Union Supply Co. v. PustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. Uloth v. City Tank Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API