Flint Hills Resources, Lp v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
POGUE, Chief Judge.
This action puts at issue the interpretation and retroactivity of an amended statute regarding a drawback claim for taxes paid on the importation of Plaintiffs goods. 1 Currently, the action is assigned to a single judge, but Plaintiff now moves for re-assignment to a three-judge panel.
DISCUSSION
A case may be assigned to a three-judge panel if it “(1) raises an issue of the constitutionality of an Act of Congress, a proclamation of the President or an Executive order; or (2) has broad or significant implications in the administration or interpretation of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Aectra Refining and Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Aectra Refining and Marketing Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Seattle Marine Fishing Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Sony Electronics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001