E.E. v. O.M.G.R.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSON, J.S.C.
The question presented to the court is whether two parties can enter into a private contract regarding a self-administered “artificial insemination” procedure whereby one party may contract with another to terminate their parental rights. This is a case of first impression under New Jersey law. This court has determined, first, that parties cannot by contract terminate their parental rights under common law. Rather, the termination of parental rights is controlled by statute. Second, the Legislature did not intend for this type of procedure to lead to the termination of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- O'CONNELL v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Matter of Baby M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Scott v. Dreamlite Holdings Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Motorworld, Inc. v. William Benkendorf077009)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- Motorworld, Inc. v. William Benkendorf077009)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- T.M.H. v. D.M.T.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Tmh v. DmtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011