Legal Opinion

Klinkert v. City of Racine

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1922PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crownhart, J.(1) In making the surveys and plats and causing the same to be recorded in the office of the register of deeds of Racine county, Herrick seems to have complied with all the requirements of ch. 47 of the Laws of 1858, then in force. 1 Taylor’s Revised Statutes, ch. 47, sec. 4. Neither these statutes nor the charter of the city of Racine contains any requirement of acceptance of the plat. Under the common law no acceptance is required. It is sufficient, both under the common law and under the statutes cited, that the city make use of the streets and alleys dedicated, or improve the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paine Lumber Co. v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Mahler v. BrumderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Smith v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. City of Superior v. Northwestern Fuel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Arnold v. VolkmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Yale University v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Cohn v. Town of RandallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. City of Jefferson v. EifflerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Tiedeman v. Village of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Heise v. Village of PewaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API