Legal Opinion

City of Jefferson v. Eiffler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1962PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

All other defendants joined in this action failed to answer and were in default. The documentary evidence was stipulated and there was no material conflict in the testimony of the witnesses. The evidence is voluminous. For the sake of brevity only those facts considered pertinent are recited.

The original plat of the village of Jefferson was recorded in 1838. It showed block 5 therein as consisting of eight lots, four on the east side of the block and four on the west, with a 16-foot alley down the center of the block from north to south.

“The commissioners who laid out and recorded said plat…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chase v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Reilly v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Paine Lumber Co. v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. City of Ashland v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Reuter v. LaweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Johnson v. City of EdgertonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  3. Cohn v. Town of RandallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  4. Monahan v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. McKenna v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API