Legal Opinion

Tiedeman v. Village of Middleton

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

Three issues are presented on this appeal:

1. Does the city of Middleton have the right to discharge surface water from the drainage area onto appellants’ land?

2. Did appellants acquire a prescriptive right to the diversion of the surface water by the railroad embankment?

3. Are appellants entitled to injunctive relief in this situation?

First: Does the city of Middleton have the right to discharge surface water from the drainage area onto appellants’ land? There are two possible theories under which the city could drain water on appellants’ land: (1) Allowing the water to continue the direction…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pettigrew v. Village of EvansvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Hoyt v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Village of Pewaukee v. SavoyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Smith v. YoumansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Maitland v. Twin City Aviation Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mayer v. GrueberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Shanak v. City of WaupacaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  3. Guinther v. SchuchtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Anhalt v. CITIES AND VILLAGES MUTUAL INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. Getka v. LaderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API