Legal Opinion
United States v. Morgan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 5, 2018No. Crim. No. 16–0196 (ESH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Before the Court is defendant's motion in limine to exclude the government's proposed cellular analysis testimony.1 For the reasons explained below, the Court denies defendants' motion with the qualification *477that Special Agent Kevin Horan may not testify or imply that he can pinpoint a person's exact location using drive testing.
BACKGROUND
On March 23, 2017, the government filed an expert disclosure letter indicating that it intended to call FBI Special Agent Kevin Horan as an expert in the analysis of cellular telephone records. (ECF No. 39.)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Vincent E. Jenkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Charles Morgan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- State v. MontanezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Lauren Bern a/k/a Lauren Britton, and Joshua Britton v. HCA-HealthOne LLC, d/b/a Swedish Medical Center, and Richard Bellon, MDDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026
- SAMUEL M. WALKER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020