Legal Opinion

State v. Harvey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 28, 2019No. A18-0205PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

Appellant Nigeria Lee Harvey appeals his convictions for first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder. Harvey argues that the district court admitted evidence in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Minn. Stat. § 626A.42 (2018), and Minn. R. Evid. 702. Harvey also argues that the district court erred when it overruled his Batson1 challenge. Finally, he raises claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial misconduct in his pro se supplemental brief. We conclude that the admission of the challenged evidence did not…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Converse v. MORSE BY MORSENebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State of Minnesota v. Michael Allan Carbo, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  3. Cedric Lamont Berry v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
  4. Harvey v. State of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
  5. State of Minnesota v. Camille Lashay Dennis-BondCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API