Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Holifield
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 15, 1991No. 89-984PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
* "The Supreme Court on December 9, 1991, entered an order granting rehearing ex mero motu. On August 18, 1992, the Court withdrew its December 9, 1991, order."
We issued the writ of certiorari to examine the narrow issue of whether a review panel lost jurisdiction over this case because of its failure to convene within a 60-day statutorily prescribed time period. Because we find the Court of Civil Appeals erred in its holding, we reverse and remand.
Julius Holifield was employed by the Birmingham Board of Education (hereinafter, the "Board"). Holifield was on nonprobationary status, when, on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bolton v. MOBILE CTY. BD. OF SCH. COM'RSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Washington v. Bessemer Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Birmingham Board of Education v. HolifieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
3Cited by10 opinions
- McLeod v. BeatyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Jefferson County Bd. of Educ. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Jones v. KennedySupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Hardy v. Birmingham Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Young v. McLeodCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.