Legal Opinion

Birmingham Board of Education v. Holifield

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 14, 1990No. Civ. 7249PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INGRAM, Presiding Judge.

Julius Holifield (employee) was employed as a noncertified employee of the Birmingham Board of Education (board). At all times relevant to this action, the employee was subject to the Fair Dismissal Act (act), § 36-26-100 et seq., Ala.Code 1975.

In September 1988, pursuant to the act, the employee received written notice from the board of the proposed termination of his employment. The grounds for the proposed termination were insubordination *419and good and just cause. The letter further stated that the proposed action was based upon the following conduct: “Possession of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bolton v. MOBILE CTY. BD. OF SCH. COM'RSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Washington v. Bessemer Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HolifieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Birmingham Bd. of Educ. v. HolifieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Birmingham Bd. of Educ. v. HolifieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Birmingham Board of Education v. HolifieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API