Legal Opinion
Martin v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 6, 2007No. 35322-9-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
¶1 William and Karyl Martin sued H.E. Sherry Johnson’s Estate for damages resulting from a leaking underground oil tank at a house the Martins bought from Johnson. The Martins and Johnson’s Estate agreed to settle the lawsuit. Johnson’s homeowners’ insurer, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company, intervened and now appeals the trial court’s ruling that the settlement was reasonable. We affirm.
FACTS
¶2 In 1996, William and Karyl Martin purchased a house from H.E. Sherry Johnson, now deceased. Johnson had owned the house, which was built in 1910, since the 1950s. In the 1970s,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Glover v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Besel v. Viking InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Joyce v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. American Nuclear InsurersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Water's Edge Homeowners Ass'n v. Water's Edge AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. American Nuclear InsurersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- SCHOOL DISTRICTS'ALLIANCE FOR ADEQUATE FUNDING OF SPECIAL EDUC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- School Districts' Alliance for Adequate Funding of Special Education v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.