Legal Opinion

Matter of Compensation of Petz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 21, 1982No. WCB 79-01374, CA A21763PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Claimant appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that reversed a referee’s opinion and order finding that he is permanently and totally disabled. Because claimant was determined to be permanently and totally disabled in 1975, the employer bears the burden of proving that he is no longer totally disabled. Bentley v. SAIF, 38 Or App 473, 478, 590 P2d 746 (1979). The issue is whether employer has sustained its burden of proof.

Claimant sustained an on-the-job injury to his back in 1969. A lumbar laminectomy was performed. He was declared medically stationary in 1970 and returned to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bentley v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Matter of Compensation of CondonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. JobeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Norton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API