Legal Opinion

Frank v. Bunker Hill Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1990No. 16595Published

1Opinion of the Court

792 P.2d 815 (1988)

117 Idaho 790

Paul E. FRANK, Claimant-Appellant,

v.

The BUNKER HILL COMPANY, Employer, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 16595.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

May 24, 1988.

Addendum May 25, 1990.

John J. Rose, Jr., Wallace, for claimant-appellant.

Evans, Keane, Koontz, Boyd, Simko & Ripley, Coeur d'Alene, for defendant-respondent. William F. Boyd argued.

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by claimant from an order of the Industrial Commission which modified a previous award. The Commission had originally held that claimant was totally and permanently disabled, and its order of modification…

Also in this document: Dissent · Bistline; Dissent · Bistline; Dissent · McDEVITT.

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. RawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. John O. England, Trustee of the Estate of Irene Mansfeldt, Bankrupt v. Morgan J. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  4. Lyons v. Industrial Special Indemnity FundIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Shammas v. ShammasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API