Legal Opinion

Kim Thul Ouk v. State of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 24, 2016No. A15-2056Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In this first-degree murder ease, appellant Kim Thul Ouk moved to correct his sentence under Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9, alleging that the juvenile court failed to follow the proper adult-certification procedures before referring him for adult prosecution. After construing Ouk’s motion as a petition for postconviction relief,.the postconviction court summarily denied the petition as procedurally barred under State v, Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 243 N.W.2d 737 (1976). We affirm.

I

In 1992 a Ramsey County grand jury indicted Ouk on two counts of first-degree felony…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Bobo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. State v. OukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API