Kim Thul Ouk v. State of Minnesota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
In this first-degree murder ease, appellant Kim Thul Ouk moved to correct his sentence under Minn. R.Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9, alleging that the juvenile court failed to follow the proper adult-certification procedures before referring him for adult prosecution. After construing Ouk’s motion as a petition for postconviction relief,.the postconviction court summarily denied the petition as procedurally barred under State v, Knaffla, 309 Minn. 246, 243 N.W.2d 737 (1976). We affirm.
I
In 1992 a Ramsey County grand jury indicted Ouk on two counts of first-degree felony…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. KnafflaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Bobo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. OukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.