Legal Opinion
Riley v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 15, 2012No. A11-1809PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
This appeal presents the issues of whether the postconviction court erred when it summarily denied appellant Adrian Dominic Riley’s second postconviction petition without an evidentiary hearing, and whether the postconviction court erred when it denied Riley’s motion for additional fingerprint and forensic DNA testing. Riley was found guilty by a Carver County jury of three counts of first-degree murder and three counts of second-degree murder arising out of the 1995 shooting deaths of Troy Tholkes, James M. Walters, and Treesa Woods. The district court entered…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BaroneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Bobo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. NicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Darryl Colbert v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.