Legal Opinion
State v. Ouk
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 13, 1994No. C7-93-576PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.
Appellant Kim Thul Ouk seeks to reverse his convictions for two counts of first degree murder in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.-185(3) and 609.05, and two counts of attempted first degree murder in violation of Minn. Stat. §§ 609.185(3), 609.17 and 609.05. Ouk, who was 15 years old at the time of the offenses, claims the trial court erred in refusing to suppress statements made by him during custodial interrogation. Ouk claims he did not voluntarily and intelligently waive his rights where he was not advised by interrogating officers that any statement he made…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. HoganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. LinderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re Welfare of G. (NMN) M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.