Legal Opinion

Spangenberg v. Spangenberg

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1912No. Civ. No. 1006PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

The plaintiff in this action seeks to recover the sum of $3,907.61, alleged to he due to him from the defendant by the terms of a contract whereby the plaintiff, the defendant and four other children of one Ferdinand Spangenberg, agreed, during the lifetime of their father, that if he “should die possessed of any property and give, devise or bequeath to any of said parties more or less than one-seventh (1/7) of the total amount of the property given, devised or bequeathed to all of said parties, then whatever property said parties or any of them received from said estate upon a partial or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Wolf v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Stringfellow v. EarlyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Smith v. DuBoseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  5. Bagley v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Sullivan v. HelbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Church v. QuinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  4. First Intercontinental Bank v. Christina AhnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Graef v. KanouseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API