Esau v. Briggs
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
This is an action to rescind an agreement to sublease certain premises, and to recover the consideration paid. The plaintiff alleged, and the court found, that plaintiff had entered into the agreement as the result of fraudulent misrepresentations on the part of defendant and his agent. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the judgment.
Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support findings by the trial court: that there was fraud on the part of defendant; that the lease and sublease were terminated; and that the cause of action was not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hefferan v. FreebairnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Twing v. SchottWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Ibrahim v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Chamberlain v. WakefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Mayer v. Northwood Textile Mills, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.