State v. White
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Chief Justice.
In his brief appellant purports to bring forward twenty assignments of error, none of which comply with Rule 28 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 783, 810. This rule requires that appellant’s brief “shall contain, properly numbered, the several grounds of exception and assignment of *402error with reference to printed pages of transcript and the authorities relied on classified under each assignment.” (-Emphasis added.) However, because this is a capital case, aided by the diligence of the members of the Attorney General’s staff who prepared the State’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DockerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. . LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. . HawleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sawyer v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.