Legal Opinion
Fleming v. Van Der Loo
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 24, 1947No. 9504PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Associate Justice.
The Price Administrator, who was appellant’s predecessor as a party to this case,1 brought a civil action in the District Court praying for an injunction against appellee’s selling garments at prices higher than ceiling prices permitted by Maximum Price Regulation 330, and for damages of $16,579.71, which sum was three times the amount of alleged overcharges, that is, sales prices in excess of legal ceiling prices. The action was based upon Section 205 of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended by the Act of June 30, 1944.2 Trial was had before the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Van Der Loo v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Bowles v. Van Der LooDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1945
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harold Ames v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And Christopher v. StreitCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- National Ass'n of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Owensby v. NesbittNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Hap Corporation v. Heyman Manufacturing Company, Heyman Manufacturing Company v. Hap CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
- Duran v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.