Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Van Der Loo

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 11, 1945No. 29900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McGUIRE, Associate Justice.

Damages denied.

Petition for injunction granted.

Respondent, in my judgment, has made an honest effort to comply and has seasonably filed, as provided under the statute, Title 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 923(c), a protest on which the petitioner has failed to act “within a reasonable time after it is filed. * * *”

True, the respondent, upon failure of the petitioner to act without undue delay, may still pursue its remedy in the Emergency Court of Appeals, Title 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 923(d), but the fact is the Administrator has done nothing other than file the present bill…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fleming v. Van Der LooCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API