Budget Finance Plan v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DEVINE, P. J.
Petitioners seek a writ of mandate directing respondent court to vacate its order commanding petitioners to answer interrogatories. The action in which the interrogatories had been put is one wherein John McDowell and Lucylle Miller (real parties in interest) seek, on behalf of themselves and others of an alleged class, rescission of retail installment sales contracts, treble damages, injunction against further asserted violations of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, and attorneys’ fees of $500 for each person found to be a member of the class.
The primary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Civil Service Employees Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Howard Gunty Profit Sharing Plan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- CashCall, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.