Legal Opinion

Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1990No. Docket Nos. B047783, B047752PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL, J.

Arthur Young & Co. seeks a writ of mandate reversing an order imposing discovery sanctions and, concurrently, appeals from an order imposing additional sanctions upon the denial of its motion for reconsideration of the discovery sanctions. We deny the writ and affirm the order imposing sanctions.

Facts

This discovery dispute does not turn on the substantive facts of this case. Procedurally, the facts relevant to the issues are not disputed.

Mattco Forge, Inc. and its president sued Arthur Young & Co. and two of its employees. While Arthur Young’s demurrer to Mattco’s original…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Salcedo v. Asociacion Cubana, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Zellerino v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Rao v. CampoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Kohan v. CohanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Estate of RuchtiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Ghanooni v. Super ShuttleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API