Legal Opinion
Howard Gunty Profit Sharing Plan v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 2001No. B145029, B145270PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
Background
The Howard Gunty Profit Sharing Plan (the Plan) commenced this action in 1998 on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, against Bank Plus Corporation, its chief executive officer, and its chief financial officer. The original complaint charged negligent misrepresentation, common law fraud, deceit under Civil Code sections 1709 and 1710, and unlawful market manipulation activity under Corporations Code sections 25400 and 25500.
In March 2000, the Plan brought a motion to be appointed lead plaintiff of the class, and for certification of the class only…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Hatfield v. Halifax PLC & HBOS PLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Espejo v. Copley Press, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Parris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.