Legal Opinion
ZAMEL, ET UX. v. Port of NY Authority
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 20, 1970PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Per curiam
The Law Division dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that they had not strictly complied with the notice of claim requirement set forth in N. J. S. A. 32:1-163, 164. They duly appealed to the Appellate Division and we certified before argument there.
On January 15, 1968 the plaintiff Jacob Zamel suffered personal injuries when he fell on an icy parking lot at the Newark Airport which is operated by the defendant Port of New York Authority. He immediately reported the incident to a police officer and was treated at the medical clinic located in Building No. 5 at the Airport.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rao v. Port of New York AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1954
- Burmek v. Miller Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Brickell v. KANSAS CITY, MOSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Perry v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- City of Birmingham v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- US Bank National Ass'n v. GuillaumeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Palanque v. Lambert-WoolleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Negron v. LlarenaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Bernstein v. BD. OF TRUST. TEACHERS'PEN. & ANN. FUNDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.