Legal Opinion

Palanque v. Lambert-Woolley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 21, 2001PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

PORITZ, C.J.

This case is substantially like Hubbard v. Reed, 168 N.J. 387, 774 A.2d 495 (2001), also decided today. We rely therefore on much of what we said in Hubbard in holding that an affidavit of merit is not required in a common knowledge malpractice case.

I

On December 12,1996, plaintiff Michelle Palanque sought medical treatment from defendant Dr. Margaret Lambert-Woolley because plaintiff was experiencing mennorhagia, a heavy menstrual bleeding. Defendant ordered a BhCG test to determine whether plaintiff was pregnant, a possible cause of her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Hubbard Ex Rel. Hubbard v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Burns v. BelafskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. Estate of Chin v. St. Barnabas Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. ZAMEL, ET UX. v. Port of NY AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Natale v. Camden County Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  2. Hubbard Ex Rel. Hubbard v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  3. Knorr v. SmealSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  4. Nuveen Municipal Trust Ex Rel. Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund v. WithumSmith Brown, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  5. Ferreira v. Rancocas Orthopedic AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API