Legal Opinion

Perry v. City of High Point

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchencic, J.

The sole question presented on this appeal is: "Was there sufficient evidence to be submitted to the jury upon an issue as to whether the plaintiffs had substantially complied with the requirement of the charter of the city of High Point relative to giving notice to the City Council as a condition precedent to the institution of the action?

The pertinent portion of the charter of the city of High Point (sec. 2, ch. 171, Private Laws 1931) reads: “Section Six. No action against the city of High Point of any character whatsoever for damages to either person or property shall be instituted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shields v. Town of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Ivester v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. McCabe v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Nevins v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. State v. . SharpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. BD. OF TRUST. TEACHERS'PEN. & ANN. FUNDNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. ZAMEL, ET UX. v. Port of NY AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Dennis v. City of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Penix v. City of St. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Heck v. City of KnoxvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API