Russell v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
By his first assignment of error defendant contends the court erred in failing to grant his motions for dismissal as to compensatory damages and punitive damages interposed at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence. This assignment has no merit.
Plaintiffs motions for dismissal purportedly were made pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41(b), which provides in pertinent part:
“. . . After the plaintiff, in an action tried by the court without a jury, has completed the presentation of his evidence, the defendant, without waiving his right to offer evidence in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Crouch v. LOWTHER TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Fagan v. HazzardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Reid v. MidgettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Seymour v. WS BOYD SALES COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
3Cited by10 opinions
- Beck v. Carolina Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Town of Spring Hope v. BissetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- E-B Grain Co. v. DentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Employers Ins. of Wausau v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Marlen C. Robb & Son Boatyard & Marina, Inc. v. the Vessel BristolDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.