Beck v. Carolina Power and Light Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
The Jury Charge on the Issue of Negligence
Defendant’s first argument on appeal is that the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury on the issue of negligence. The trial court instructed:
*377What is negligence? It’s a lack of ordinary care. It’s a failure to do what a reasonably careful and prudent person would have done, or the doing of something which a reasonably careful and prudent person would not have done; considering all of the circumstances existing at the time in question and on the occasion in question.
The court continued with another rule of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Brewer v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Sebastian v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Gregory v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Horne v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Boyd v. LG DeWitt Trucking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Cole v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Estate of Hendrickson Ex Rel. Hendrickson v. Genesis Health Venture, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Cissell v. Glover Landscape Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.