Legal Opinion

Fagan v. Hazzard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1976No. 7618SC65PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

By exceptions one, two, and three, defendant contends the court erred “in refusing as a matter of law to set aside entry of default and allow filing of answer on the grounds that no excusable neglect has been shown.”

First, we point out that there was no “entry of default” nor was there a default judgment under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 55(b). The record discloses that the defendant filed his answer and counterclaim more than thirty days after summons and complaint had been properly served as provided by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 4, without having obtained leave to do so. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 6(b) in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peed v. Burleson's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Clemmons v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Worthy v. . KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Crouch v. LOWTHER TRUCKING COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Whitaker v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Bell v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Russell v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Memorial Hospital of Alamance County, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Mabe v. DillonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API