Legal Opinion

Seymour v. WS BOYD SALES COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1962No. 18PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

In Supreme Court defendant demurred ore terms on the ground that the amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Hall v. Coach Co., 224 N.C. 781, 32 S.E. 2d 325. Construing the pleading liberally in favor of pleader, as we are required to do (Glover v. Brotherhood, 250 N.C. 35, 108 S.E. 2d 78), we find that it alleges facts sufficient for causes of action, (1) for breach of warranty of title and against encumbrances, and (2) for wrongful conversion. The demurrer is overruled.

There remains for decision the question: Did the court below err in striking the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Binder v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Price v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Calhoun v. Universal Credit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Close v. CrosslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Manufacturing Co. v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mulvaney v. Tri State Truck & Auto Body, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Standing v. MidgettDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
  3. Russell v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Fagan v. HazzardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Martin-Kahill Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. SkidmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API