Legal Opinion

Estate of Bohn v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 16, 1996No. 1 CA-TX 94-0009PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

Taxpayers, who are retired federal employees or their spouses or representatives, appeal from a judgment on mandate entered by the tax court after our opinion in Estate of Bohn v. Waddell, 174 Ariz. 239, 848 P.2d 324 (App.1992), became final. They broadly contend that the tax court misinterpreted the legal effect of our opinion on remand. Their appeal, and the Department of Revenue’s (DOR) opposition thereto, raise these specific issues:

1. Whether the taxpayers’ appeal has been rendered moot by their post-mandate receipt of tax refunds or credits pursuant to DOR’s tax…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martineau v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Kerr v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Forum Development, L.C. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Southwest Airlines Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Robert J. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API