Legal Opinion

Forum Development, L.C. v. Arizona Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 11, 1997No. 1 CA-TX 96-0019, 1 CA-TX 96-0020, 1 CA-TX 96-0021PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

These consolidated appeals concern provisions enacted in 1994 and 1995 to govern the filing of valuation and classification appeals during a two-year transition between the pre-1995 statutory valuation and tax appeal timetable and the post-1996 timetable. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In an uncodified session law, the legislature set forth procedures for the review of tax assessments during an interim period consisting of tax years 1995 and 1996. The session law required county assessors to mail property assessment notices for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Ness v. Western Security Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Peabody Coal Co. v. Navajo CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Santos v. SimonArizona Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Long v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. State v. WagnerArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Pima County Assessor v. Arizona State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Premiere RV & Mini Storage LLC v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API