Legal Opinion

Cascade Floral Products, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 15, 2008No. 35461-6-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 — The Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) appeals the trial court’s summary judgment order declaring that Washington’s farm labor contractors act1 (Act) does not apply to the brush picking industry, including Cascade Floral Products and other forest greenery packinghouses. L&I argues that the trial court erred in its ruling because brush picking workers are engaged in “forestation or reforestation” within the meaning of the Act. Holding that the packinghouse owners are not “agricultural employers” under the Act and that brush picking is not a “forestation or reforestation” or related…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Rozner v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bovain v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. State v. HainesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State Of Washington v. Grocery Manufacturers AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Bovain v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API