Legal Opinion

Bovain v. Canal Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 2009No. 26664PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BEATTY:

Raymond Bovain, Jr. brought this declaratory judgment action as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Willor Dean Bovain, his late wife, after she died in a collision with a logging truck that was insured by Canal Insurance. Bovain asserted the truck driver was a “motor carrier” and sought reformation of the insurance policy to increase its limit of coverage to $750,000 pursuant to 23A S.C.Code Ann. Regs. 38-414 (Supp.2008) (requiring heightened insurance coverage for “motor carriers”). Canal Insurance opposed the request and sought a declaration that the $40,000 of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. LeathermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Jordon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Windham v. PaceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  5. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. JerniganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hooper v. Ebenezer Senior Services & Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Hotel & Motel Holdings, LLC v. BJC Enterprises, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  3. Shirley's Iron Works, Inc. v. City of UnionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. Melton v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Auto-Owners Insurance v. BenjaminCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API