Legal Opinion
California Ass'n of Retail Tobacconists v. State
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 2003No. D037599PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MCDONALD J.
In these appeals we consider the constitutionality of Proposition 10, an initiative adopted by the electorate in November 1998, which enacted the California Children and Families Act of 1998 (the Act). The Act increased the tobacco excise tax for the stated purposes of reducing tobacco use, particularly among teenagers, and funded early child development and antismoking programs. It created the statewide California Children and Families Commission (CCFC) and local county commissions to administer its statutory mandates, and added section 130100 et seq. to the Health and…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Cerritos v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- County of Sonoma v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Borikas v. Alameda Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Redevelopment Agency v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Johnson v. Cnty. of Mendocino, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.